Reviewer

Review Anatomy

This page explains exactly how a Tenki review appears in your PR and how to interpret each component.

Summary

The Summary is a high-level, decision-oriented overview of the PR.

It appears immediately and updates as the analysis progresses.

TenkiCodeReviewerReviewAnatomy

Structure:

  • What has been reviewed
  • Findings grouped by severity
  • Short recap of key issues
  • Collapsed list of files reviewed
  • Security risk assessment: An explicit security assessment of the PR. Only high-confidence, PR-fixable security issues are reported.
    • LOW — No security vulnerabilities identified
    • MEDIUM — Security edge cases introduced
    • HIGH — Exploitable vulnerabilities found

Review Comment

The Review Comment contains the full breakdown of findings.

It appears at the same time as the Summary and updates live during analysis.

TenkiCodeReviewerReviewComment2 TenkiCodeReviewerReviewComment2

Structure:

Security

  • High / Medium / Low severity
  • Includes explanations when applicable

Code Quality

  • General code health assessment
  • Structural or maintainability concerns

Other Observations

Additional relevant signals, such as:

  • Performance risks
  • Architectural concerns
  • Notable patterns introduced
  • Repeated anti-patterns

Recommendation

A single, clear outcome:

  • APPROVE — Safe to merge
  • APPROVE with minor suggestions — Non-blocking issues
  • CHANGES REQUESTED — Blocking issues must be addressed

Reporting Scope

Tenki only reports issues that:

  • Are introduced by this PR
  • Could cause bugs, security risks, or instability
  • Can be addressed within the PR